Using Social Media to Engage the Public in Sustainable Development Initiatives
Main Article Content
Abstract
The issue of sustainable development arose in 1987 as a concern for the present and future of all countries worldwide, serving as a means to meet current needs and ensure those of future generations. The concept of sustainable development combines economic, social, and environmental spheres as a foundation—a triad for shaping life on Earth. There are many tools for forming sustainable development. One of them is the work of public initiatives (organizations), but they also require certain conditions for their existence. Given the significant importance of technologization and digitalization, the authors of the study analyze "social media" as a tool for engaging public initiatives in sustainable development. The article separately examines the functions and benefits of sustainable development, the types and functions of social media, and the risks and challenges for both areas. The study employs comparative-historical, hermeneutic, and deductive methods. At the end of the study, the authors conclude that social media is the voice of public organizations, offering an opportunity to spread their work, conduct public education, and find like-minded individuals. The authors also emphasize the importance of education and upbringing of citizens, as this influences critical thinking in consuming information, the desire to participate in social life, and the responsible use of sustainable development tools.
Downloads
| Abstract views: 243 | PDF Downloads: 178 |
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bakker, J., Denters, B., Oude Vrielink, M., & Klok, P. J. (2012). Citizens’ initiatives: how local governments fill their facilitative role. Local Government Studies, 38(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.698240.
Barroso-Moreno, C., Rayon-Rumayor, L., & Garcia-Vera, A.-B. (2023). Big data and business intelligence on twitter and instagram for digital inclusion. Comunicar, 31(74). https://doi.org/10.3916/c74-2023-04.
Blok, S., van Buuren, A. W., & Fenger, H. J. M. (2023). The public value of citizens’ initiatives: evidence from a Dutch municipality. The American Review of Public Administration, 027507402311751. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231175162.
Bortnyk, N. P., & Yesimov, S. S. (2020). Legal regulation of public initiatives: Current state and directions of development. https://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/bitstream/1234567890/2833/1/10.pdf
Chawla, S., & Mehrotra, M. (n.d.). Impact of emotions in social media content diffusion. Informatica. https://www.informatica.si/index.php/informatica/article/view/3575/1622
Chen, J., He, J., Xie, Z., & Li, D. (2024). Public perceptions and discussions of synthetic nicotine on Twitter. Frontiers in Public Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1370076.
Chmyr (n.d) Green economy: essence, goals and basic principles. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/87412468.pdf
Coates, A. E., Hardman, C. A., Halford, J. C. G., Christiansen, P., & Boyland, E. J. (2020). “It’s just addictive people that make addictive videos”: children’s understanding of and attitudes towards influencer marketing of food and beverages by youtube video bloggers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020449
De Jans, S., Hudders, L., & Cauberghe, V. (2018). Adolescents’ self-reported level of dispositional advertising literacy: how do adolescents resist advertising in the current commercial media environment? Young Consumers, 19(4), 402-420. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-02-2018-00782
De Jans, S., Van de Sompel, D., Hudders, L., & Cauberghe, V. (2019c). Advertising targeting young children: an overview of 10 years of research (2006–2016). International Journal of Advertising, 38, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.141105639363
De Veirman, M., Hudders, L., & Nelson, M. R. (2019). What is influencer marketing and how does it target children? A review and direction for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02685.
Duong, H., Nguyen, L., & Vu, H. (2020). With whom do consumers interact?: Effects of online comments and perceived similarity on source credibility, content credibility, and personal risk perception. Journal of Social Marketing, 10(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-02-2019-0023.
Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. (n.d.). Brundtland Report. Encyclopædia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Brundtland-Report
Fernandez, S., Stöcklin, M., Terrier, L., & Kim, S. (2021). Using available signals on LinkedIn for personality assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 93, 104122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104122
Finlayson, A. (2020). YouTube and political ideologies: technology, populism and rhetorical form. Political Studies, 003232172093463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720934630.
Guo, B. (2019). The role of public participation in environmental governance: empirical evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(17), 4696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174696.
Igalla, M., Edelenbos, J., & van Meerkerk, I. (2019). What explains the performance of community-based initiatives? Testing the impact of leadership, social capital, organizational capacity, and government support. Public Management Review, 22(4), 602–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1604796.
Johnson, R., & Lee, C. (2019). The impact of economic policy on investment: A case study of European markets. Information Economics and Policy, 47, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2018.10.001
Khomyuk, V. S., & Kolodny, V. V. (n.d.). Development of online platform for the public initiative. https://ir.lib.vntu.edu.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/41089/17503.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Kim, J., & Choi, H. (2019), Value co-creation through social media: a case study of a start-up company. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.6262
Kirkby, J., Keefe, P., & Timberlake, L. (2022). Sustainable development: An introduction. In J. Kirkby, P. Keefe, & L. Timberlake (Eds.), Sustainable Development: An Overview (pp. 1-15). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003403432-1
Kong, H. M., Witmaier, A., & Ko, E. (2021). Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research, 131, 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.041
Kovalchuk, S., & Kovalchuk, T. (2021). Analysis of the effectiveness of public administration in Ukraine. Economy and Society, 28, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-28-5
Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H. (2020). YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027.
Latiff, Z. A., & Safiee, N. A. S. (2015). New business set up for branding strategies on social media – instagram. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.100.
Liu, X., Wei, Y., & Liu, J. (2022). Renewable energy policy evolution and transformation in China: A comprehensive review. Renewable Energy, 196, 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.032
López-Rabadán, P. & Mellado, C. (2019). Twitter as a space for interaction in political journalism. Dynamics, consequences and proposal of interactivity scale for social media. Communication & Society, 32(1), 1-18. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.32.1.1-18
Luhmann, N. (2010). The reality of mass media. Kyiv: TsVP. https://www.aup.com.ua/uploads/luman_web.pdf
Lyashuk, N. (2021). Social network tools for the implementation of public initiatives. http://baltijapublishing.lv/omp/index.php/bp/catalog/download/108/2980/6338-1
Machova, R., Santa, K., & Basa, P. (2021). International overview of business profiles from the perspective of Instagram users. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 5(3), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.3-01.
Mallipeddi, R. R., Kumar, S., Sriskandarajah, C., & Zhu, Y. (2020). A framework for analyzing influencer marketing in social networks: Selection and scheduling of influencers. Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3899
Marcos-García, S., Alonso-Muñoz, L., & López-Meri, A. (2020). Extending influence on social media: The behaviour of political talk-show opinion leaders on Twitter. Communication & Society, 33(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.2.277-293.
McGregor, S. C., & Molyneux, L. (2018). Twitter’s influence on news judgment: An experiment among journalists. Journalism, 21(5), 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918802975.
Østergaard, P. A., Duic, N., Noorollahi, Y., & Kalogirou, S. (2022). Renewable energy for sustainable development. Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.065
Østergaard, P. A., Duic, N., Noorollahi, Y., Mikulcic, H., & Kalogirou, S. (2020). Sustainable development using renewable energy technology. Renewable Energy, 146, 2430–2437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.094
Özcan, A., & Tunca, M. Z. (2021). A study on clustering performance of Twitter usage statistics of state university rectors in Turkey. European Journal of Digital Economy Research, 2(2), 61-75. https://ejderhub.com/index.php/ejder/article/view/32
Peterson, A. (2022). Sustainable Development: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.nl/books?hl=uk&lr=&id=N5h-EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=sustainable+development&ots=_LKrfxaQYk&sig=tvOw5UWQH4y1nHXPjxE9wun2NdM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=sustainable%20development&f=false
Rahmatika, R., Yusuf, M., & Agung, L. (2021). The effectiveness of youtube as an online learning media. Journal of Education Technology, 5(1), 152. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i1.33628.
Ruan, T., & Lv, Q. (2023). Public perception of electric vehicles on Reddit and Twitter: A cross-platform analysis. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 21, 100872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100872.
Ruda, M. V., & Mazurik, M. M. (2021). Cooperation between Ukraine and the EU in the field of sustainable development: Overview of perspectives. https://science.lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/journal-paper/2021/jun/23805/menedzhment121-206-213.pdf
Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. *Science of The Total Environment*. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481
Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., Gupta, S., & Mahroof, K. (2019). Role of big data and social media analytics for business to business sustainability: A participatory web context. Industrial Marketing Management, 86, 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.003
Sun, L., Lu, X., Xie, Z., & Li, D. (2022). Public reactions to the new york state policy on flavored electronic cigarettes on twitter: observational study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 8(2), e25216. https://doi.org/10.2196/25216.
Urpelainen, J., & Van de Graaf, T. (2017). United States non-cooperation and the Paris agreement. Climate Policy, 18(7), 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1406843
Walker, T. R. (2021). (Micro)plastics and the UN sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 30, 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100497
We are social (Ed.) (2021). Digital 2021. The latest insights into the ‘state of digital’. We Are Social Ltd. https://bit.ly/3POIhJV
Willems, L. G., & Alizadeh, T. (2015). Social Media for Public Involvement and Sustainability in International Planning and Development. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 4(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2015100101.
Wright-Arora, G., James, M., Troiano, M., Sidwell, N., Boyle, J., Barbrook-Johnson, P., & Hirons, M. (2024). The role of publics and deliberation at the environmental science-policy interface. Agile Initiative, Oxford Martin School.
Zaitseva, L. O. (2019). Integration of sustainable development into the activities of companies. https://dspace.luguniv.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/9909
Zimmermann, D., Noll, C., Gräßer, L. et al. (2020). Influencers on YouTube: a quantitative study on young people’s use and perception of videos about political and societal topics. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01164-7.