Incentives for the Deployment of Social Responsibility Management in Ukrainian Enterprises
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article examines the prerequisites and practices of social responsibility of Ukrainian enterprises to identify success factors that are important in choosing areas of implementation of social measures. We conducted the research in the following sequence. First, we analyzed the state of social responsibility management based on the monitoring of macroeconomic indicators in terms of external vectors of the corporate culture system. Then we set the level of awareness of regional governments about socially responsible business. Finally, we supplemented the analysis results with data from the monitoring of the attitude of management structures to the need to implement a system of corporate social responsibility of Ukrainian enterprises based on the Sustain Ability matrix. In the end, we summarized the priority factors of success resulting from corporate social responsibility management.
We have proved that the formation of methods for assessing the management of social responsibility should consider internal and external vectors in the corporate culture system. The assessment of vectors of social responsibility should be carried out, taking into account the volume of social investments, their quality and efficiency. We found that the most crucial success factors are increased productivity, reduced costs and the ability to diversify markets.
Downloads
| Abstract views: 81 | PDF Downloads: 156 |
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Balabanyuk, Z. H. (2012). Vzayemozvyazok korporatyvnoyi sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalnosti ta polityky rukhu personalu orhanizatsiyi [The relationship between corporate social responsibility and personnel policy of the organization]. Ekonomika ta derzhava. 3. 25–28. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecde_2012_3_9.
Balakiryeva, O. & Halustyan, Y. U. (2007). Sotsialʹno vidpovidalʹnyy biznes v Ukrayini: ponyattya ta osnovni chynnyky [Socially responsible business in Ukraine: concepts and main factors]. Ukrayinsʹkyy sotsium. 5–6. 99–109.
Buleyev, I., Bryukhovetskaya, N. & Chernykh Ye. (2008). Sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' biznesa: teoriya i praktika [Social responsibility of business: theory and practice]. Donetsk: IEP NAN Ukrainy; DonUEP.
Burlakova, Y. U. (2009). Korporatyvna sotsialʹna vidpovidalʹnistʹ yak osnova harmonizatsiyi dobrobutu suspilʹstva [Corporate social visibility is the basis for harmonizing the welfare of society]. Ekonomika: problemy teoriyi ta praktyky : zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ. 252./. IV. 881–891.
Valitov, S. H. & Mal'gin, V. A. (2009). Vzaimodeystviye vlasti i biznesa: sushchnost', novyye formy i tendentsii, sotsial'naya otvetstvennost' [Interaction between government and business: essence, new forms and trends, social responsibility]. Izdatel'stvo «Ekonomika.
Hrishnova, O. (2011). Sotsialʹna vidpovidalʹnistʹ u konteksti podolannya systemnoyi kryzy v Ukrayini [Social responsibility in the context of overcoming the systemic crisis in Ukraine]. Demohrafiya ta sotsialʹna ekonomika. 1(15). 39-46.
Drobyshev, V. (2006). Global'nyy dogovor − investitsii v budushcheye [Global Compact - Investing in the Future]. Direktor. 10. 68-69.
Meir, A. (2012). Biznesmeny i obshchestvo: korporativnaya filantropiya [Businessmen and Society: Corporate Philanthropy]. Material sayta mezhdunarodnoy yevreyskoy religioznoy organizatsii Esh a-Tora. http://www.evrey.com/sitep/ethics/arkhiv.php3?menu=267.
Nadyeyko, M. (2020). Analiz stanu menedzhmentu sotsialʹnoyi vidpovidalʹnosti pidpryyemstva za zovnishnimy vektoramy [Analysis of the state of management of social responsibility of the enterprise by external vectors]. Naukovi zapysky Lʹvivsʹkoho universytetu biznesu ta prava. Seriya ekonomichna. 27. 36–44.
Pushkar, M. & Holinach L. (2018). Sotsialʹna vidpovidalʹnistʹ biznesu: teoriya i praktyka [Corporate social responsibility: theory and practice]. Ternopilʹ : Kart-blansh.
Sardak, S. & Haslenko K. (2017). Vnutrishnya korporatyvna sotsialʹna vidpovidalʹnistʹ pidpryyemstva: teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty [Internal corporate social responsibility of the enterprise: theoretical and practical aspects]. Ekonomika i suspilʹstvo. 12. 342–347.
Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. (2021). Statystychnyy shchorichnyk Ukrayiny za 2020 rik [Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2020]. http://ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/01/Arch_zor_zb.htm
Yachmenʹova, V. & Tsarenko N. (2011). Korporatyvna kulʹtura promyslovoho pidpryyemstva: formuvannya ta rozpodil vytrat [Corporate culture of an industrial enterprise: formation and distribution of costs]. Arial.
Bowen Howard R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. (1953). N.Y.: Harper & Row.
Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review. 4(4). 497-505.
Chen, Y. C., Hung, M. & Wang, Y. (2018). The effect of mandatory CSR disclosure on firm profitability and social externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2018. 65. 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009.
Drucker, P. (1994). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. N.-Y. : Harper&Row.
Fridman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to increase its Profits. New York Yimes Magazine. September, 13. 122-126.
Ikram, M., Mahmoudi, A., Shah, S. & Mohsin, M. (2019). Forecasting number of ISO 14001 certifications of selected countries: Application of even GM (1,1), DGM, and NDGM models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 26, 12505–12521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04534-2.
Ikram, M., Zhou, P., Shah, S. & Liu, G. Q. (2019). Do environmental management systems help improve corporate sustainable development? Evidence from manufacturing companies in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production. 226. 628–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.265